ABSTRACT
Background: Placenta previa contributes substantial maternal and neonatal morbidity including management challenges for obstetrician. This study was to evaluate the potential risks factors and feto-maternal, outcome in placenta previa. This study was done with the intent of developing insight into risk factors, clinical presentation, various interventions and management for overall improvement in maternal and fetal outcome in placenta previa.Methods: A prospective observational study, where 30 cases of placenta previa confirmed after 28 weeks POG, treated in a public sector tertiary care hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were included. Authors analyzed the data to evaluate the potential risks factors and maternal and fetal outcome in placenta previa.Results: In this study, major contributing risk factors for placenta previa were associated with multiparity (76.7%), maternal age >30 in 50%, previous LSCS in 46.7%, repeated uterine procedure like suction evacuation/curretage. There was a high rate of maternal morbidity mainly due to haemorrhage. Perioperative uterine artery embolization (UAE) in 3 (10%), intra-operative procedures namely devascularization, internal iliac ligation in 66.6% cases, peripartum hysterectomy in 2 (6.66%) were done to control haemorrhage. Blood and blood products transfusion required in 26.7% of cases. Fetal morbidity included prematurity in 9 (33.3%), NICU admission in 11 (36.6%) majority of which included 8 (26.7%) babies of birth weight <2000 grams.Conclusions: Placenta previa contributes to significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. Multiparity, post LSCS pregnancy constitute major factor for placenta previa. Management requires high-risk obstetrical care with frequent antenatal visits. Serial ultrasonography in reported cases of low-lying placenta is mandatory to exclude over diagnosis or migration. All cases of placenta previa need to be managed in a higher centre with facility of blood component therapy and neonatal intensive care unit. Prematurity and low birth weight remain a significant cause for neonatal morbidity.
ABSTRACT
Background: In this modern era of the 21st century, mobile phones have undoubtedly been part and parcel of our lives as it has revolutionized our lifestyle. We can communicate with one another, retrieve information about education, and can use it for entertainment purpose. However, like all other good things, mobile phone also comes with its own demerits such as it causes various health hazards ranging from insomnia, numbness of fingers, irritability to headache, anxiety, and dreadful addiction. Objectives: The aim and objective of this study were to assess adverse health effects of mobile phone use among medical students in a government medical college. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted among the medical students in Murshidabad Medical College, West Bengal. A pre-designed, pre-tested, anonymous questionnaire was used to assess the mobile use pattern among the students. Results: All the students were using mobile with 28% using it for more than 6 h every day. 43% of students experienced medical problems with majority complained a lack of concentration. Duration of the use of mobile phones was significantly associated with the development of health problem. Conclusion: With increased risk of health problems associated with excessive mobile use, one should emphasize on reserving the use of cell phones for shorter conversations and other healthy modes of entertainment.
ABSTRACT
A total of 523 cases of primary bone tumours and tumour like lesions in and around Dakshina Kannada district of Karnataka were diagnosed over a period of 36 years. About 39% of these tumours were malignant and the remaining benign. Among the malignant tumours the highest incidence was of osteosarcoma (45.7%) followed by Ewing's sarcoma (19.4%). Osteochondroma was the most frequent in the benign tumour category (30.3%). Peak incidence of tumour was in the 2nd and 3rd decade of life with a male preponderance. The most commonly affected bones were femur, tibia and humerus in that order. Results indicate a significantly higher incidence of primary bone tumours in this part of India.